Pages

Search This Blog

Saturday, April 02, 2005

Improbability of Chance

If 0+0=0, then why do we insist on believing in the Big Bang? Surely nothing from nothing will always result in nothing. As a point of fact, the aforementioned as a formulaic action did not happen because it could not.

If the above be true, how do we continue to believe in evolution? Surely what has happened is not evolution but adaptation? It is a cliched argument, but surely we should see more evidence of evolution? I find it hard to believe eolution for lack of the trail of proof. We can look at the development of the automobile and therein we see 'evolution' as we currently define it.

If we take the above analogy and use it in an effort to explain what evolution should look like, then surely the proof just does not exist? My disclaimer is that I am no scientist but it all seems rather obvious to me.

So, how did this all come to be. I know of no other reasonable consideration but there is a 'higher order' that began things. This is in itself logically impossible to comfortably grasp, but here I find myself. Thinking once again on the origins of all we know.

1 comment:

mindispower said...

I think that in essence you have merely re-worded my original post.